[More Details]:-The Strategic Implications Of A Possible Russian Base In Somaliland

Saturday April 07, 2018 - 16:20:40 in Wararka by Abdi A.
  • Visits: 613
  • (Rating 0.0/5 Stars) Total Votes: 0
  • 0 0
  • Share via Social Media

    [More Details]:-The Strategic Implications Of A Possible Russian Base In Somaliland

    Russia-(Caalami-News)-If the unconfirmed reports about a possible Russian base in the breakaway region of Somaliland are to be believed, then Moscow is finally flexing its military muscles beyond Eurasia and signaling its eagerness to return to Afric

    Share on Twitter Share on facebook Share on Digg Share on Stumbleupon Share on Delicious Share on Google Plus

Russia-(Caalami-News)-If the unconfirmed reports about a possible Russian base in the breakaway region of Somaliland are to be believed, then Moscow is finally flexing its military muscles beyond Eurasia and signaling its eagerness to return to Africa.

The typically trustworthy Alt-Media information portal South Front republished the claims that have been circulating for the past couple of days about a possible Russian military base in the breakaway region of Somaliland, a development that initially caught many observers off guard but is entirely explainable in hindsight if it actually comes to pass. 

The report alleges that Moscowhas been in talks with the self-proclaimed authorities in Hargeisa to build a small multiuse air and naval facility in the Djibouti-bordering town of Zeila in exchange for formally recognizing the region’s "independence”. The UAE is already constructingits own base in Berbera despite not officially recognizing Somaliland, but the Gulf State is arising military powerwith much more money to throw around than Russia and therefore probably isn’t subject to the same conditions as Moscow would be for that simple pecuniary reason.

Somaliland map

Somaliland Backgrounder

As a brief but incomplete backgrounder, Somaliland used to be a British colony that was reunited with its ethnic Somali brethren in 1960, after which it separated from "rump” Somalia following the overthrow of President Barre and the subsequent multisided civil war that engulfed the country. The de-facto government of Somaliland believes that Barre’s late Cold War-era anti-insurgency policy towards their region constituted what they’ve since termed the "Isaaq genocide” and therefore entitled them to secede for security’s sake. Whatever the legitimacy of this move, the undisputed fact is that geostrategically positioned Somaliland has remained functionally independent and largely peaceful since then, which Hargeisa insists should further its claim to international recognition of its independence. Mogadishu, however, maintains that the region should return back to its formal control, albeit in the newly implemented "federal” system that it says will prevent past abuses from reoccurring.

Geostrategic Significance

Somaliland, just like equally unrecognized butsimilarly sovereignSouth Yemen, sided with the UAE in the War on Yemen and now hosts an Emirati military facility in Berbera that Abu Dhabi plans to pair with its existing ones in Aden and the Socotra Islands to make it the "gatekeeper” of the strategic Bab el Mandeb chokepoint over EU-Chinese maritime trade. This process is occurring in parallel with theexpansionof the Gulf Cold Warto the Horn of Africaand the international militarization of the Red Sea in making the region one of the most conflict-prone hotspots in the world today. It’s with this context in mind that Russia might be considering a dual naval-air base in Somaliland just a few miles away from the US’ one in Djibouti, which if built would complement China’s own to the west of Camp Lemonnier in strategically "flanking” the Americans.

Russia’s "Pivot To Africa”

Somaliland Foreign Minister Dr. Saad Ali Shire meets with Russian diplomat Yury Kourchakov

Somaliland Foreign Minister Dr. Saad Ali Shire (centre right) meets with Russian diplomat Yury Kourchakov (centre) in 2017

Russia’s possible base in Somaliland would be about much more than just spiting the Americans, as it would be part and parcel of Moscow’s intended "Pivot to Africa” that was hinted at during the end of last year following the country’sdispensation of military aidto the Central African Republic and offer bySudantoset up a military facilityon its Red Sea coast. Related to these two developments, there were also signs at the beginning of this year that any African Pivot could see Moscowrelying more on mercenariesas the vanguard force in stabilizing conflict-torn countries and creating the conditions for Russia to "balance” intra-state and international affairs across the continent as a result. In this instance, Russia could potentially mediate betweenSomaliland & Somalia properand then "balance” between both of them and their much larger landlocked neighbor of Ethiopia.

Ethiopia And The UAE

In connection with this, observers should be reminded of thelong-running relationsbetween Russia and Ethiopia that laid the basis for theirongoing rapprochementfollowing nearly three decades of neglect after the end of the Cold War. Ethiopia is China’s top partner in Africa, and the recently built Djibouti-Addis Ababa Railway (DAAR) is essentially an "AfricanCPEC”. Given the military "overcrowding” in tiny Djibouti and the relatively long distance between Port Sudan and Ethiopia, Russia might have decided to build a base in Somaliland as a "backdoor” to Ethiopia, with whom Hargeisa is allied. Furthermore, Ethiopia’sjoint developmentof a port in Berbera with the UAE, as well as Russia’s increasing relations with both of these emerging Great Powers, point to tacit economic-strategic motivations behind Moscow’s possible decision to build a base in nearby Zeila because it could "kill several birds with one stone” by strengthening Russia’s ties with all three parties.

The "19th-Century Great Power Chessboard”

Nevertheless, any move in this direction would undoubtedly be seen as a "betrayal” of Somalia by its one-time Cold War patron despite Russia decisively siding with Ethiopia during the 1978-79Ogaden Warand "trading” Mogadishu for Addis Ababa at that time in unprecedentedly swapping regional allies with the US. Just like then, Neo-Realist calculations would be at the heart of this decision, albeit this time predicated on "balancing” the "19th-Century Great Power Chessboard” that’s become infinitely more complex in theemerging Multipolar World Orderthan during the "good ‘ole days” of bipolarity. As proof of this policy in action in an African context, one needs look no further thanRussia’s new policy towards Libyathat now regards Gaddafi’s overthrow as an "internal affair” despite having called attention to it as an internationally significant development in the early days of the "Arab Spring” theater-wide Color Revolution.

Concluding Thoughts

The completely unideological and interest-driven foundations of contemporary Russian foreign policy stand in stark contrast to thedogmatic narrativespewed by Alt-Media demagogues who purport that Moscow can only countenance doing the polar opposite of whatever America’s allies are, meaning in this case that Russia "wouldn’t ever” contribute (whether deliberately or not) to Somalia’s "Balkanization” by building a base in Somaliland alongside the US’ "LittleSparta” and in close proximity to the landlocked country that used to be itsregional enforcer. The times have certainly changed, proving that the New Cold War is nothing like its predecessor and that the Russian Federation of today definitely isn’t anything like the Soviet Union of the past when it comes to its foreign policy "principles”. That’s not necessarily a "bad” thing, but just a reflection of the international reality in which Russia’s forced to operate if it desires to advance its interests in the face ofconsiderable multidimensional asymmetric American pressure.

DISCLAIMER:The authorwrites for this publication in a private capacity which is unrepresentative of anyone or any organization except for hisown personal views. Nothing written by the authorshould ever be conflated with the editorial views or officialpositions of any other media outlet or institution.









Leave a comment